ATPARG
Racquet Rating: not currently rated. Insufficient recent evidence (25 qualifying matches; 40 required)
Official ATP Ranking
#63
Every published Racquet Rating observation for Roman Andres Burruchaga, from the canonical rating artifact.
Rating history is unavailable until the player meets the minimum evidence requirement. This player has 25 of the 40 qualifying matches required.
The history plots published Racquet Rating observations. It is never interpolated or back-filled.
The published Racquet Rating is the sum of five weighted model components. This is that sum, for Roman Andres Burruchaga.
Racquet Rating requires at least 40 qualifying matches in the 4-year rating window before a current rating is published, so there are no components to explain yet. This player has 25 of them.
Performance over the headline rating window. Rates are shown only where the surface sample provides sufficient evidence.
Surface performance over the rating window: 25 matches, 25 with a recorded surface. Surfaces played: Clay. Clay, 11 wins and 14 losses, 44.0 percent, 95 percent interval 27 to 63 percent. These rates describe this player only and are not used to rank players.
Clay
Clay, 11 wins and 14 losses, 44.0 percent, 95 percent interval 27 to 63 percent.
These records come from the same canonical match observations as the headline Racquet Rating, over the same 25-match rating window. Nothing here is a separate rating.
A win rate appears only where a surface has at least 10 matches. Below that a single result moves the percentage by ten points or more, so the record is shown and the percentage is not.
The range beside each rate is a 95% confidence interval. It is wide on purpose: a surface record of a few dozen matches does not pin a percentage down, and the interval is the honest width of that uncertainty rather than a claim of precision.
Matches whose source records no surface are counted in the totals and assigned to no surface. They are never redistributed.
This player's record over their last 10 matches in the rating window. A record of what happened, not a prediction.
Last 10 matches: 5 wins and 5 losses, played Feb 2026 – May 2026.
Last 10 matches
The last 10 matches this player actually played, from the same canonical match data as the headline Racquet Rating. Retirements count — a match was played and a winner advanced. Walkovers do not, because no match took place.
Match dates in the source are tournament start dates, so several matches can share a date. The order is reconstructed from the tournament and the round, which is why the record is shown as a total and not as a sequence of individual results.
The dates above are the span these 10 matches cover. For a player who has not competed recently that span can be well in the past, which is why it is always shown.
Victories over the highest-ranked opponents in the published rating window, using the opponent's official rank at the time of the match.
The 5 highest-ranked opponents defeated in the published rating window, out of 11 wins over ranked opponents. Ordered by the opponent's ranking at the time of each match, best first.
Defeated Learner Tien, ranked number 22 at the time of the match, in March 2026 at Houston · Quarterfinal.
Defeated Brandon Nakashima, ranked number 33 at the time of the match, in March 2026 at Houston · Round of 16.
Defeated Lorenzo Sonego, ranked number 44 at the time of the match, in May 2025 at Rome Masters · Round of 128.
Defeated Camilo Ugo Carabelli, ranked number 46 at the time of the match, in February 2026 at Rio de Janeiro · Round of 32.
Defeated Sebastian Baez, ranked number 64 at the time of the match, in May 2026 at Roland Garros · Round of 128, opponent retired.
Every win this player recorded in the rating window against an opponent the source ranks, ordered by that opponent's official ranking in the week of the tournament, and limited to the 5 highest. Each opponent appears once, at that player's highest-ranked victory over them.
The ranking shown is the opponent's ranking at the time of that match, taken from the same match record as the result. It is not their ranking today, and not their career-high.
Retirements are included and marked. The match was played and a winner advanced, and it counts toward the rating this profile explains — but it was not completed, so it is not presented as though it had been.
These sections are published only once the underlying verified data exists. Nothing below is estimated or inferred in the meantime.