ATPESP
Racquet Rating: not currently rated. Insufficient recent evidence (11 qualifying matches; 40 required)
Official ATP Ranking
#82
Every published Racquet Rating observation for Daniel Merida Aguilar, from the canonical rating artifact.
Rating history is unavailable until the player meets the minimum evidence requirement. This player has 11 of the 40 qualifying matches required.
The history plots published Racquet Rating observations. It is never interpolated or back-filled.
The published Racquet Rating is the sum of five weighted model components. This is that sum, for Daniel Merida Aguilar.
Racquet Rating requires at least 40 qualifying matches in the 4-year rating window before a current rating is published, so there are no components to explain yet. This player has 11 of them.
Performance over the headline rating window. Rates are shown only where the surface sample provides sufficient evidence.
Surface performance over the rating window: 11 matches, 11 with a recorded surface. Surfaces played: Hard, Clay. Hard, 0 wins and 1 loss. No win rate is published: a rate requires at least 10 matches on a surface and this record covers 1. Clay, 6 wins and 4 losses, 60.0 percent, 95 percent interval 31 to 83 percent. These rates describe this player only and are not used to rank players.
Hard
Hard, 0 wins and 1 loss. No win rate is published: a rate requires at least 10 matches on a surface and this record covers 1.
Clay
Clay, 6 wins and 4 losses, 60.0 percent, 95 percent interval 31 to 83 percent.
These records come from the same canonical match observations as the headline Racquet Rating, over the same 11-match rating window. Nothing here is a separate rating.
A win rate appears only where a surface has at least 10 matches. Below that a single result moves the percentage by ten points or more, so the record is shown and the percentage is not.
The range beside each rate is a 95% confidence interval. It is wide on purpose: a surface record of a few dozen matches does not pin a percentage down, and the interval is the honest width of that uncertainty rather than a claim of precision.
Matches whose source records no surface are counted in the totals and assigned to no surface. They are never redistributed.
This player's record over their last 10 matches in the rating window. A record of what happened, not a prediction.
Last 10 matches: 6 wins and 4 losses, played Mar 2026 – May 2026.
Last 10 matches
The last 10 matches this player actually played, from the same canonical match data as the headline Racquet Rating. Retirements count — a match was played and a winner advanced. Walkovers do not, because no match took place.
Match dates in the source are tournament start dates, so several matches can share a date. The order is reconstructed from the tournament and the round, which is why the record is shown as a total and not as a sequence of individual results.
The dates above are the span these 10 matches cover. For a player who has not competed recently that span can be well in the past, which is why it is always shown.
Victories over the highest-ranked opponents in the published rating window, using the opponent's official rank at the time of the match.
The 5 highest-ranked opponents defeated in the published rating window, out of 6 wins over ranked opponents. Ordered by the opponent's ranking at the time of each match, best first.
Defeated Corentin Moutet, ranked number 30 at the time of the match, in April 2026 at Madrid Masters · Round of 64.
Defeated Adrian Mannarino, ranked number 43 at the time of the match, in March 2026 at Bucharest · Round of 16.
Defeated Fabian Marozsan, ranked number 47 at the time of the match, in March 2026 at Bucharest · Semifinal.
Defeated Marco Trungelliti, ranked number 77 at the time of the match, in April 2026 at Madrid Masters · Round of 128.
Defeated Titouan Droguet, ranked number 122 at the time of the match, in March 2026 at Bucharest · Quarterfinal, opponent retired.
Every win this player recorded in the rating window against an opponent the source ranks, ordered by that opponent's official ranking in the week of the tournament, and limited to the 5 highest. Each opponent appears once, at that player's highest-ranked victory over them.
The ranking shown is the opponent's ranking at the time of that match, taken from the same match record as the result. It is not their ranking today, and not their career-high.
Retirements are included and marked. The match was played and a winner advanced, and it counts toward the rating this profile explains — but it was not completed, so it is not presented as though it had been.
These sections are published only once the underlying verified data exists. Nothing below is estimated or inferred in the meantime.